0.00/0.10 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 1440 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 180 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Thu Jul 4 06:45:09 EDT 2024 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime : 0.16/0.42 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.16/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZWVpRRQpB8/E---3.1_30358.p 782.55/98.84 # Version: 3.2.0-ho 782.55/98.84 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 782.55/98.84 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 782.55/98.84 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores 782.55/98.84 # Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores 782.55/98.84 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores 782.55/98.84 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 180s (1) cores 782.55/98.84 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 180s (1) cores 782.55/98.84 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 180s (1) cores 782.55/98.84 # Starting full_lambda_10 with 180s (1) cores 782.55/98.84 # Starting new_ho_8 with 180s (1) cores 782.55/98.84 # post_as_ho2 with pid 30440 completed with status 0 782.55/98.84 # Result found by post_as_ho2 782.55/98.84 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 782.55/98.84 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 782.55/98.84 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores 782.55/98.84 # Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores 782.55/98.84 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores 782.55/98.84 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 180s (1) cores 782.55/98.84 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 180s (1) cores 782.55/98.84 # No SInE strategy applied 782.55/98.84 # Search class: HGHSF-FFSF22-SSSFFSNN 782.55/98.84 # partial match(1): HGHSF-FFSF22-SSSFFSBN 782.55/98.84 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 782.55/98.84 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 98s (1) cores 782.55/98.84 # ho_unfolding_3 with pid 30448 completed with status 7 782.55/98.84 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 19s (1) cores 782.55/98.84 # post_as_ho2 with pid 31800 completed with status 0 782.55/98.84 # Result found by post_as_ho2 782.55/98.84 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 782.55/98.84 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 782.55/98.84 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores 782.55/98.84 # Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores 782.55/98.84 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores 782.55/98.84 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 180s (1) cores 782.55/98.84 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 180s (1) cores 782.55/98.84 # No SInE strategy applied 782.55/98.84 # Search class: HGHSF-FFSF22-SSSFFSNN 782.55/98.84 # partial match(1): HGHSF-FFSF22-SSSFFSBN 782.55/98.84 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 782.55/98.84 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 98s (1) cores 782.55/98.84 # ho_unfolding_3 with pid 30448 completed with status 7 782.55/98.84 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 19s (1) cores 782.55/98.84 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 782.55/98.84 # Presaturation interreduction done 782.55/98.84 782.55/98.84 # Proof found! 782.55/98.84 # SZS status Theorem 782.55/98.84 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 782.55/98.84 thf(decl_sort1, type, a: $tType). 782.55/98.84 thf(decl_22, type, cS: a > $o). 782.55/98.84 thf(decl_23, type, cR: a > $o). 782.55/98.84 thf(decl_24, type, esk1_0: a). 782.55/98.84 thf(decl_25, type, esk2_0: a > a). 782.55/98.84 thf(decl_26, type, esk3_0: a). 782.55/98.84 thf(decl_27, type, esk4_0: a). 782.55/98.84 thf(decl_28, type, esk5_2: (a > a) > a > a). 782.55/98.84 thf(cTHM30_pme, conjecture, (![X1:a]:(((cS @ X1)<=(cR @ X1)))<=>![X2:a > a, X1:a]:((?[X3:a]:((((X1)=(X2 @ X3))&(cR @ X3)))=>?[X3:a]:((((X1)=(X2 @ X3))&(cS @ X3)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZWVpRRQpB8/E---3.1_30358.p', cTHM30_pme)). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((![X1:a]:(((cR @ X1)=>(cS @ X1)))<=>![X2:a > a, X1:a]:((?[X3:a]:((((X1)=(X2 @ X3))&(cR @ X3)))=>?[X3:a]:((((X1)=(X2 @ X3))&(cS @ X3))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM30_pme])])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X13:a, X14:a, X15:a > a, X16:a, X17:a]:((((((((esk3_0)=(esk2_0 @ esk4_0))|(cR @ esk1_0))&((cR @ esk4_0)|(cR @ esk1_0)))&(((esk3_0)!=(esk2_0 @ X13))|~(cS @ X13)|(cR @ esk1_0)))&(((((esk3_0)=(esk2_0 @ esk4_0))|~(cS @ esk1_0))&((cR @ esk4_0)|~(cS @ esk1_0)))&(((esk3_0)!=(esk2_0 @ X13))|~(cS @ X13)|~(cS @ esk1_0))))&((((X16)=(X15 @ (esk5_2 @ X15 @ X16)))|(((X16)!=(X15 @ X17))|~(cR @ X17))|(~(cR @ X14)|(cS @ X14)))&((cS @ (esk5_2 @ X15 @ X16))|(((X16)!=(X15 @ X17))|~(cR @ X17))|(~(cR @ X14)|(cS @ X14)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a > a, X3:a, X4:a]:(((cS @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ X1))|(cS @ X4)|((X1)!=(X2 @ X3))|~((cR @ X3))|~((cR @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a > a, X3:a, X4:a]:((((X1)=(X2 @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ X1)))|(cS @ X4)|((X1)!=(X2 @ X3))|~((cR @ X3))|~((cR @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X2:a > a, X1:a]:(((cS @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ (X2 @ X1)))|(cS @ X3)|~((cR @ X3))|~((cR @ X1)))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ((cR @ esk4_0)|(cR @ esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X2:a > a, X1:a]:((((X2 @ X1)=(X2 @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ (X2 @ X1))))|(cS @ X3)|~((cR @ X3))|~((cR @ X1)))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > a, X1:a]:(((cS @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ (X2 @ esk4_0)))|(cR @ esk1_0)|(cS @ X1)|~((cR @ X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > a, X1:a]:((((X2 @ esk4_0)=(X2 @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ (X2 @ esk4_0))))|(cR @ esk1_0)|(cS @ X1)|~((cR @ X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_6])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > a]:(((cS @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ (X2 @ esk4_0)))|(cS @ esk4_0)|(cR @ esk1_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_6])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > a]:((((X2 @ esk4_0)=(X2 @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ (X2 @ esk4_0))))|(cS @ esk4_0)|(cR @ esk1_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_6])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cR @ esk1_0)|((esk3_0)!=(esk2_0 @ X1))|~((cS @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ((cR @ esk1_0)|(cS @ esk4_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, (((esk3_0)=(esk2_0 @ esk4_0))|(cR @ esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, (cR @ esk1_0), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13]), c_0_14])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > a, X1:a]:(((cS @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ (X2 @ esk1_0)))|(cS @ X1)|~((cR @ X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_15])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > a, X1:a]:((((X2 @ esk1_0)=(X2 @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ (X2 @ esk1_0))))|(cS @ X1)|~((cR @ X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_15])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > a]:(((cS @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ (X2 @ esk1_0)))|(cS @ esk1_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_15])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > a]:((((X2 @ esk1_0)=(X2 @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ (X2 @ esk1_0))))|(cS @ esk1_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_15])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ((cR @ esk4_0)|~((cS @ esk1_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, (cS @ esk1_0), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, (cR @ esk4_0), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21])])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:((((esk3_0)!=(esk2_0 @ X1))|~((cS @ X1))|~((cS @ esk1_0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > a, X1:a]:(((cS @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ (X2 @ esk4_0)))|(cS @ X1)|~((cR @ X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_22])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:((((esk2_0 @ X1)!=(esk3_0))|~((cS @ X1)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_21])])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > a]:(((cS @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ (X2 @ esk4_0)))|(cS @ esk4_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_22])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > a, X1:a]:((((X2 @ esk4_0)=(X2 @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ (X2 @ esk4_0))))|(cS @ X1)|~((cR @ X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_22])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, (((esk3_0)=(esk2_0 @ esk4_0))|~((cS @ esk1_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > a]:(((cS @ esk4_0)|((esk2_0 @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ (X2 @ esk4_0)))!=(esk3_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > a]:((((X2 @ esk4_0)=(X2 @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ (X2 @ esk4_0))))|(cS @ esk4_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_22])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, ((esk2_0 @ esk4_0)=(esk3_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_21])])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_32, negated_conjecture, (cS @ esk4_0), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_30]), c_0_31])])). 782.55/98.84 thf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_32]), c_0_31])]), ['proof']). 782.55/98.84 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 782.55/98.84 # Parsed axioms : 4 782.55/98.84 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 782.55/98.84 # Initial clauses : 11 782.55/98.84 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3 782.55/98.84 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8 782.55/98.84 # Processed clauses : 62 782.55/98.84 # ...of these trivial : 0 782.55/98.84 # ...subsumed : 11 782.55/98.84 # ...remaining for further processing : 51 782.55/98.84 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2 782.55/98.84 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 782.55/98.84 # Backward-subsumed : 10 782.55/98.84 # Backward-rewritten : 18 782.55/98.84 # Generated clauses : 185 782.55/98.84 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 184 782.55/98.84 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 782.55/98.84 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1 782.55/98.84 # Paramodulations : 183 782.55/98.84 # Factorizations : 0 782.55/98.84 # NegExts : 0 782.55/98.84 # Equation resolutions : 2 782.55/98.84 # Disequality decompositions : 0 782.55/98.84 # Total rewrite steps : 26 782.55/98.84 # ...of those cached : 22 782.55/98.84 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 782.55/98.84 # Propositional check models : 0 782.55/98.84 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 782.55/98.84 # Propositional clauses : 0 782.55/98.84 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 782.55/98.84 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 782.55/98.84 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 782.55/98.84 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 782.55/98.84 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 782.55/98.84 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 782.55/98.84 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 782.55/98.84 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 782.55/98.84 # Current number of processed clauses : 13 782.55/98.84 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5 782.55/98.84 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 782.55/98.84 # Negative unit clauses : 1 782.55/98.84 # Non-unit-clauses : 7 782.55/98.84 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 91 782.55/98.84 # ...number of literals in the above : 178 782.55/98.84 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 782.55/98.84 # Current number of archived clauses : 36 782.55/98.84 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 63 782.55/98.84 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 50 782.55/98.84 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 17 782.55/98.84 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8 782.55/98.84 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 782.55/98.84 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3 782.55/98.84 # BW rewrite match successes : 3 782.55/98.84 # Condensation attempts : 0 782.55/98.84 # Condensation successes : 0 782.55/98.84 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10467 782.55/98.84 # Search garbage collected termcells : 209 782.55/98.84 782.55/98.84 # ------------------------------------------------- 782.55/98.84 # User time : 97.964 s 782.55/98.84 # System time : 0.043 s 782.55/98.84 # Total time : 98.008 s 782.55/98.84 # Maximum resident set size: 1800 pages 782.55/98.84 782.55/98.84 # ------------------------------------------------- 782.55/98.84 # User time : 97.967 s 782.55/98.84 # System time : 0.046 s 782.55/98.84 # Total time : 98.013 s 782.55/98.84 # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages 782.55/98.84 % E---3.1 exiting 782.55/98.84 % E exiting 782.55/98.84 EOF